Inferences - Verbal Reasoning Questions and Answers with solutions or explanation for interview, entrance tests and competitive exams. Practice online quiz, fully solved examples with detailed answers. Are you searching for the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions and Answers? If your answer is yes, then refer to this post. At the bottom of this article, we have arranged the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Online Test with the multiple choice questions and answers. The hopefuls can practice the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Quiz and learn the concepts behind the Inferences topic. With the help of this post, the competitors can learn Inferences Verbal Reasoning MCQ Questions and Answers along with the simple explanations. So, the contenders need to move to the below sections and prepare the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions.
Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions - Inferences Verbal Reasoning Quiz Details
| Online Test Name |
Inferences |
| Exam Type |
Multiple Choice Questions |
| Category |
Verbal Reasoning Quiz |
| Number of Questions |
60 Questions |
Inferences are the steps in reasoning, moving from premises to the logical consequences. Unlike the most Verbal Reasoning questions, in which the argument consists of both a premise and a conclusion, in Inference Questions, the argument consists. On this page, we are providing the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Quiz consisting of the multiple choice questions. Thus, the competitors can check the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions from the below sections of this post.
Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions
60 Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions are provided on this page to prepare for the examinations. All the applicants can check and take part in the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Quiz to know the questions along with the answers. The questions related to the Inferences arranged in this article are repeated in the previous competitive examinations. Thus, the candidates can check and know all the different type questions to score marks in the Reasoning section. Visit our web portal @ Allindiaexams.in to prepare for the exams and to practice the online tests. From the above tabular format, the applicants can know about the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Quiz which is presented in this post.
Inferences MCQ Quiz Answers with Solutions
Practice makes man Perfect. To become perfection in the Inferences topic, the competitors need to practice the online tests and quizzes. For the Inferences Verbal Reasoning Questions, we have arranged the answers along with the explanation. Thus, the competitors can check and know the description of all the questions with the help of this article. The candidates who are interested in knowing about the Inferences topic can practice the online test which is arranged on this page. Students can use the View Answer button to know the exact answers and explanation to the questions.
1. Should there be a law to punish parents who get their minor children married?
Arguments:
I. Yes, a minor girl is physiologically not prepared to conceive a baby.
II. No, this has been a custom prevailing since many centuries.
- A. if only argument I is strong.
- B. if only argument II is strong.
- C. if either I or II is strong.
- D. if neither I nor II is strong.
- E. If both I and II are strong.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Statement I explains a valid reason to go against such marriages because it is wrong to encourage anything that jeopardises the health of a person. Hence, (I) is a strong argument.
Statement II is not a valid argument because a custom being followed since a long time does not necessary make it good. Only I is strong.
2. Should the institute conduct classes in remote villages?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this will help those students who belong to villages and cannot visit urban ares for studies.
II. No, this is not an economically viable proposal, as the number of students who attend such classes cannot contribute to break-even.
- A. if only argument I is strong.
- B. if only argument II is strong.
- C. if either I or II is strong.
- D. if neither I nor II is strong.
- E. If both I and II are strong.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
Statement I: The basic purpose of conducting classes is to help students. Hence, statement I is a strong argument as it conveys this idea.
Statement II: If the institute conducts classes with the intention of making profits, then this is a valid point to be considered. Hence, statement II is also strong.
3. Are there any good politicians left in this world?
Arguments:
I. Yes, so many poor people are sustaining themselves and improving economically.
II. No, there is nothing in this world which is completely good or completely bad.
- A. if only argument I is strong.
- B. if only argument II is strong.
- C. if either I or II is strong.
- D. if neither I nor II is strong.
- E. if both I and II are strong.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
Just because some poor people are improving economically, we cannot conclude that there are good politicians. Any reason could be ascribed to such an improvement. Statement II is very vague and is not giving any reasons for the argument that it proposes. Hence, both the statements are weak arguments.
4. Are these sanctuaries, which are meant to protect the endangered animals, necessary?
Arguments:
I. Yes, these are necessary as it is our responsibility to conserve environment and to provide posterity with a better world to live in.
II. No, these are a huge burden on our receding economy.
- A. if only argument I is strong.
- B. if only argument II is strong.
- C. if either I or II is strong.
- D. if neither I nor II is strong.
- E. if both I and II are strong.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
Sanctuary for endangered animals becomes necessary when it improves and betters the living conditions of the world. But at the same time, if an economy is not able to provide basic necessities to its people, then it cannot think of constructing sanctuaries. Therefore, the decision is based on both the factors viz. requirement and funds supply. Hence, both I and II are strong arguments.
5. Should the teachers be stopped from beating the students?
Arguments:
I. Yes, child psychologies say that beating hinders the learning process in a child.
II. No, spare the cane and spoil the child.
- A. if only argument I is strong.
- B. if only argument II is strong.
- C. if either I or II is strong.
- D. if neither I nor II is strong.
- E. if both I and II are strong.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Anything which hinders the learning process in a child must be controlled and, if possible, be prohibited. The aim of teacher should be to make a child learn. According to argument I, beating causes hindrance to learning process of a child thus defeating the ultimate goal. If also supports its argument by referring to the findings of psychologists. Hence, I is a strong argument. Argument II states that a child will be spoiled if it is not caned. Caning is an extreme measure, there are also other softer methods to rectify a child. Moreover, the argument is not substantiated by any facts. Hence, II is a weak argument.
